Wow, two crappy records, but the Ratt cover is much better. I guess their commercial success allowed them to hire a decent photographer. Those are pretty good pictures of a rotten band versus the Black and Blue cover which is a rotten picture of a rotten.
Bob-You sure didn't wake up on the glam side of the bed today did you?
I'll go with Ratt. The photos and the red logo work well enough. Black -n- Blue although far better than their other album covers looks more like it should be the back of the album. Then again the group shot is always tough to pull off as an album cover.
I don't know man, a lot of hair on both albums. I'm going to go with RATT so I can at least appear respectable. Did Gene Simmons shoot the cover for Black n' Blue?
Wow, two crappy records, but the Ratt cover is much better. I guess their commercial success allowed them to hire a decent photographer. Those are pretty good pictures of a rotten band versus the Black and Blue cover which is a rotten picture of a rotten.
ReplyDeleteDancing Undercover.....no contest. It looks like the billboard for a gay Las Vegas All Male Revue!
ReplyDeleteBob-You sure didn't wake up on the glam side of the bed today did you?
ReplyDeleteI'll go with Ratt. The photos and the red logo work well enough. Black -n- Blue although far better than their other album covers looks more like it should be the back of the album. Then again the group shot is always tough to pull off as an album cover.
I don't think there is a glam side of the bed for me unless it's T Rex and Mott the Hoople! And maybe Hanoi Rocks...
ReplyDeleteRatt.
ReplyDeleteI don't know man, a lot of hair on both albums. I'm going to go with RATT so I can at least appear respectable. Did Gene Simmons shoot the cover for Black n' Blue?
ReplyDeleteMartell-Gene did produce Black -n- Blue's third and forth albums.
ReplyDeleteRatt's seems more tasteful.
ReplyDeleteMetal Mark - I thought so. Then he stole Thayer and a couple of the riffs I might add.
ReplyDelete