I am not crazy about either. The KISS one looks like it was done in 1982 not 2009. The WASP one is okay, but reminds me of a Hammerfall cover. Not that this a bad thing, but just that WASP deserve more and have had better covers in the past. I'll go with KISS though because at least the colors are bright and bold.
The Kiss cover is kinda cool, though a bit of Rock n Roll Over rip-off. I'm sure it's much better than the music (based on a combination of history and hearing "Modern Day Delilah").
However, who can argue with the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse? I've only heard one track from this one too, but it's a lot better than the new Kiss tune. I'm going with WASP for cover and music.
W.A.S.P.
ReplyDeleteI am not crazy about either. The KISS one looks like it was done in 1982 not 2009. The WASP one is okay, but reminds me of a Hammerfall cover. Not that this a bad thing, but just that WASP deserve more and have had better covers in the past. I'll go with KISS though because at least the colors are bright and bold.
ReplyDeleteThe Kiss cover is kinda cool, though a bit of Rock n Roll Over rip-off. I'm sure it's much better than the music (based on a combination of history and hearing "Modern Day Delilah").
ReplyDeleteHowever, who can argue with the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse? I've only heard one track from this one too, but it's a lot better than the new Kiss tune. I'm going with WASP for cover and music.
I like them both, but the KISS cover is definitely a throw back. I will go with W.A.S.P.'s Babylon.
ReplyDeleteThis is tough. Both of these covers suck. Talk about unoriginal.
ReplyDeleteI love W.A.S.P. and I'm excited about the new album, but the four horsemen thing is so played out.
I think I'm going to go with KISS. Trust me, I'm shocked by this as well.
I like the W.A.S.P cover more.
ReplyDelete