Recently Theo over at metal-mixtape was writing about the new Skidrow and some of the comments left and my own opinion had me thinking about vocalist changes. As far as this band goes, I am in the camp of those that have no real interest in a Skidrow album without Sebastian Bach. Yet looking back I was one of the few who supported Motley Crue's one album without Vince Neil. So why do we accept some bands who change vocalists and not others? I have always seen Van Halen with Sammy as a different band than they were with Dave. I accept AC/DC with Brian Johnson a little more although I much prefer the Bon Scott material. I like Iron Maiden with Bruce and with Dianno yet I try hard to forget the Blaze Bayley era. Sometimes it's just whether an album is good or not. Then other times like with Van Halen or Skidrow, I think it's very hard to replace a frontman who was so good because you identify that band with that person.