Monday, June 22, 2009

Clash of the album covers

It is...

Photobucket
Black -n- Blue-s/t

vs.

Photobucket
Ratt-Dancing Undercover

***Which cover do you prefer?

Labels: , ,

9 Comments:

Blogger bob_vinyl said...

Wow, two crappy records, but the Ratt cover is much better. I guess their commercial success allowed them to hire a decent photographer. Those are pretty good pictures of a rotten band versus the Black and Blue cover which is a rotten picture of a rotten.

6:19 AM  
Blogger t-o-n said...

Dancing Undercover.....no contest. It looks like the billboard for a gay Las Vegas All Male Revue!

12:21 PM  
Blogger Metal Mark said...

Bob-You sure didn't wake up on the glam side of the bed today did you?

I'll go with Ratt. The photos and the red logo work well enough. Black -n- Blue although far better than their other album covers looks more like it should be the back of the album. Then again the group shot is always tough to pull off as an album cover.

1:10 PM  
Blogger bob_vinyl said...

I don't think there is a glam side of the bed for me unless it's T Rex and Mott the Hoople! And maybe Hanoi Rocks...

1:16 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Ratt.

3:02 PM  
Anonymous Martell said...

I don't know man, a lot of hair on both albums. I'm going to go with RATT so I can at least appear respectable. Did Gene Simmons shoot the cover for Black n' Blue?

7:10 AM  
Blogger Metal Mark said...

Martell-Gene did produce Black -n- Blue's third and forth albums.

7:19 AM  
Blogger DPTH International said...

Ratt's seems more tasteful.

8:01 AM  
Anonymous Martell said...

Metal Mark - I thought so. Then he stole Thayer and a couple of the riffs I might add.

8:32 AM  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home